Best practice recommendations for conducting after-action reviews to enhance public health preparedness

The threat of serious, cross-border infectious disease outbreaks in Europe is a significant challenge in terms of public health emergency preparedness (PHEP). An integral part of improving preparedness and response planning is learning from past experience. Conducting after-action reviews (AARs) on public health emergencies is one such approach, but there is no standardised approach to conducting such assessments. This report identifies the common features of AARs, develops a validity assessment tool for appraising AARs, and proposes a set of best practice recommendations.

Producer: ECDC
Year of publication: 2018

Resource data

Content type:  Project document
Areas of work: Monitoring and evaluation, Social science
Region: Global

Additional language downloads
No items found

More on Information

Tool | 2021

This toolkit aims to provide healthcare workers with the tools, skills and content needed to effectively share authentic and reliable information online.

Case study, Evaluation, Methodology, Tool | 2021

Drawing on the documented experiences of nine rapid assessments covering six countries (Afghanistan, Bangladesh, India, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka), this report shares insights with regard to the design and implementation of...

Evaluation | 2021

This report seeks to communicate operational recommendations based on social media monitoring from September 18-24, as well as relevant information on current mis/disinformation.