Collective Service
Wiki

Resources

Collective Service Documentation

Internews

(Mis)communication? Social listening and the exclusion of marginalised voices

Description

This article aims to contribute to the growing scholarship on the use of social media by humanitarian organisations in a crisis. Although social media’s role in times of crisis has been rigorously studied, much of this work looks at the distribution or collection of information by first-responders or relief organisations. However, there is a growing interest in the analysis of social media content to understand community perceptions and to guide public health and risk communication interventions. This article aims to explore some key limitations of data collected using Social Media Analytics (SMA) tools in fairly representing community-wide perceptions. Through a review of ‘social listening reports’ produced by UN bodies and international aid organisations, this article will explore whether these data deficiencies are fairly represented. This article concludes that while there are many well documented limitations in the use of social media discourse to holistically represent community perceptions, these limitations are not adequately discussed in the reporting produced from this data. Consequentially, users of this analysis cannot adequately weigh the quality of the data when using it to influence policy decisions.

Link

Additional languages

No items found

DETAILS

Publication

2022

Authors

Internews

Emergency

COVID-19

Scope

Community engagement, Risk communication, Community feedback, Social science

Language

English

Region

Global

Keywords

FAQ